Takeaways from the NCUA Deregulation Project
August 20, 2026
For years, credit union leaders have navigated the dense thicket of the 12 CFR, often grappling with a “compliance fatigue” that stifles innovation. Balancing operational growth against a rigid and complex regulatory framework has felt like a zero-sum game. However, the regulatory weight is beginning to lift.
Spurred by the catalyst of Executive Order 14192 (“Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation”), the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) is currently executing a massive, multi-year “Deregulation Project.” Phase One (2025–2027) is focused on modernizing the agency’s framework by identifying rules that are obsolete, duplicative, or overly burdensome. For the strategic credit union leader, this represents a shift toward a more principles-based supervisory environment.
The end of the client-customer automatic bar
One of the most significant shifts involves proposed changes to 12 CFR 701 (Appendix B) regarding associational common bonds. Historically, the NCUA maintained an “automatic bar” against groups primarily based on a client-customer relationship. If joining an association required the purchase of a product or service, such as an insurance policy, the group was automatically disqualified from Field of Membership (FOM) eligibility.
The new proposal moves from an automatic bar to a process of further evaluation. The NCUA Board has determined that a product purchase requirement is no longer a hard no. Instead, the agency will evaluate if the client-customer relationship is merely incidental to the group’s broader activities. This shift to a holistic evaluation opens significant new doors for FOM expansion, allowing credit unions to partner with associations they previously would have ignored.
The new proposal moves from an automatic bar to a process of further evaluation. The NCUA Board has determined that a product purchase requirement is no longer a hard no. Instead, the agency will evaluate if the client-customer relationship is merely incidental to the group’s broader activities. This shift to a holistic evaluation opens significant new doors for FOM expansion, allowing credit unions to partner with associations they previously would have ignored.
Flexing senior management compensation
In a competitive labor market, attracting and retaining high-level talent is vital for institutional resiliency. However, the NCUA’s historical blanket prohibition on loan-related compensation has been a major pain point, often suffering from varying interpretations and inconsistent enforcement across the NCUA’s different regions.
Proposed changes to 12 CFR 701.21(c)(8) seek to resolve this confusion. By adding a formal definition of “overall financial performance,” the rule would explicitly permit credit unions to offer incentives and bonuses to employees, including senior management, that incorporate lending metrics. As long as these metrics are part of a broader evaluation of the institution’s financial health, the NCUA now views this as a critical tool for recruitment rather than a hurdle.
Proposed changes to 12 CFR 701.21(c)(8) seek to resolve this confusion. By adding a formal definition of “overall financial performance,” the rule would explicitly permit credit unions to offer incentives and bonuses to employees, including senior management, that incorporate lending metrics. As long as these metrics are part of a broader evaluation of the institution’s financial health, the NCUA now views this as a critical tool for recruitment rather than a hurdle.
Removing prescriptive training deadlines
Volunteer boards are the lifeblood of the credit union movement, but prescriptive mandates can deter community members from serving. Currently, 12 CFR 701.4(b)(3) mandates that every director attain a “working familiarity” with finance and accounting within six months of election or appointment.
The NCUA is now proposing to eliminate this rigid six-month deadline. While the agency continues to hold the core expectation that directors possess financial expertise, it admits the current rigid clock is “unduly burdensome” and can “undermine the ability of a credit union’s members to elect their board.” This is a clear win for community representation: the requirement for competence remains, but the arbitrary training clock is being dismantled.
The NCUA is now proposing to eliminate this rigid six-month deadline. While the agency continues to hold the core expectation that directors possess financial expertise, it admits the current rigid clock is “unduly burdensome” and can “undermine the ability of a credit union’s members to elect their board.” This is a clear win for community representation: the requirement for competence remains, but the arbitrary training clock is being dismantled.
Lifting the caps on third-party auto servicing
Effective September 8, 2026, a final rule will remove the restrictive caps previously found in 12 CFR 701.21(h). In the past, credit unions were capped at 50% of their net worth for indirect auto loans serviced by third parties, only reaching 100% after 30 months of experience with a specific servicer.
By removing these prescriptive limitations, the burden of risk management shifts from federal mandates to the board’s own risk tolerance. This allows institutions to manage liquidity and portfolio diversity based on their unique needs rather than a one-size-fits-all cap.
By removing these prescriptive limitations, the burden of risk management shifts from federal mandates to the board’s own risk tolerance. This allows institutions to manage liquidity and portfolio diversity based on their unique needs rather than a one-size-fits-all cap.
“With today’s announcement, we are moving forward on our commitment to removing regulations that are obsolete, burdensome, duplicative, or simply guidance that has no place in regulation. Our goal is to make it easier for credit unions to serve their members, meet compliance requirements, and stay innovative. These final rules and those that come after will give credit unions the flexibility to do just that.” — Chairman Kyle Hauptman
The guidance vs. regulation cleanup
A key pillar of this project is ensuring that non-binding guidelines are not misinterpreted as enforceable law. The NCUA is stripping several “Appendices” out of the Code of Federal Regulations and moving them into “Letters to Credit Unions.” This cleanup clarifies that guidance should be followed as best practice, but it is not independently enforceable.
Key areas moving out of the CFR into guidance include:
Key areas moving out of the CFR into guidance include:
- Safeguarding Member Information: Moving the standards for protecting the security of records (formerly 748 Appendix A).
- Response Programs: Moving the guidance for responding to unauthorized access to member data (formerly 748 Appendix B).
- Voting Guidelines: Moving the non-binding suggestions for obtaining fair votes during conversions (found in 12 CFR 708a).
Modernized catastrophic reporting
During a crisis, management should focus on stabilizing operations, not filling out forms. To reflect this, the NCUA is modernizing 12 CFR 748.1(b).
The reporting window for catastrophic acts is being increased from 5 business days to 15 calendar days. Furthermore, in a significant procedural shift, reports are now to be made directly to the NCUA rather than the Regional Director. This centralizes the reporting process and gives credit unions the necessary breathing room to manage emergency conditions before worrying about regulatory paperwork.
The reporting window for catastrophic acts is being increased from 5 business days to 15 calendar days. Furthermore, in a significant procedural shift, reports are now to be made directly to the NCUA rather than the Regional Director. This centralizes the reporting process and gives credit unions the necessary breathing room to manage emergency conditions before worrying about regulatory paperwork.
A new era of safety and soundness
The Deregulation Project represents a fundamental pivot in the NCUA’s philosophy. By categorizing rules as Obsolete, Duplicative, Overly Burdensome, or Guidance, the agency is attempting to prioritize relief that actually impacts daily operations.
While this signals a move toward principles-based supervision, do not expect exams to be less rigorous. The focus remains squarely on safety and soundness, but with a renewed respect for the business judgment of credit union boards.
Note: Credit unions must continue to follow all existing regulations as they currently appear in the Code of Federal Regulations until the relevant Final Rules are officially effective. For help navigating regulatory compliance, learn more about Y&A’s compliance consulting services.
While this signals a move toward principles-based supervision, do not expect exams to be less rigorous. The focus remains squarely on safety and soundness, but with a renewed respect for the business judgment of credit union boards.
Note: Credit unions must continue to follow all existing regulations as they currently appear in the Code of Federal Regulations until the relevant Final Rules are officially effective. For help navigating regulatory compliance, learn more about Y&A’s compliance consulting services.